r/WorkAdvice has 1.2 million members and a more measured tone than r/antiwork. Where antiwork tends toward validation of worker frustration, WorkAdvice tends toward practical guidance: here is what happened at work, here is what I should do about it. The situations are often more nuanced — involving professional relationships, manager dynamics, and situations where there isn't an obvious villain.
The court sees a significant overlap between WorkAdvice cases and its own docket. The difference is in what each offers: WorkAdvice gives you strategies. The court gives you a verdict on whether anyone committed a crime.
Work situations that feel wrong but aren't vibe crimes
One of the court's most useful contributions to the WorkAdvice genre is ruling that certain situations people feel guilty about are not, in fact, crimes. The social pressure to perform above your contract is real. The court has ruled on it repeatedly.
"I applied for another job while employed and didn't tell my manager"
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — not a crime. You have no obligation to disclose a job search.
"I took my full lunch break every day even when colleagues worked through theirs"
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — unanimous. The break is contracted. Taking it is not guilt-worthy.
"I declined a promotion because I didn't want more responsibility"
Ruling: Vibe, 4-1 — your career, your choice. The court is not the HR department.
"I asked for a raise before my review was scheduled"
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — asking is not a crime. The answer might be no. That's different.
Work situations that are crimes (that WorkAdvice often handles too gently)
"I accepted a job offer and then declined it a week before starting because a better one came in"
Ruling: Crime, 4-1 — the acceptance was a commitment. Breaking it has costs for real people.
"I told a colleague I'd cover for them and then didn't when it became inconvenient"
Ruling: Crime, 5-0 — you made a commitment to a specific person. That's different from a policy.
"The court distinguishes between obligations you chose and obligations that were assigned to you. You chose to accept the offer. You chose to cover the shift. The choice creates the obligation." — Riley, Chief of Vibe Justice
⚖ The Court on Work Guilt
CERTIFIED VIBE
"Applying elsewhere. Taking your lunch. Declining extra work. Asking for what you're worth. None of these are crimes. The court has reviewed the docket. The guilt is not proportionate to the acts."
The workplace guilt audit — 15 things you're allowed to do
The court has compiled the fifteen most common sources of workplace guilt that it has ruled, consistently, are not crimes. This list exists because the social pressure to perform beyond your contracted obligations is real, and the court wants the record to reflect its position clearly.
“Leaving exactly at the end of your contracted hours”
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — unanimous. Your contract specifies your hours. Leaving on time is not a social crime.
VIBE
“Not attending optional work social events”
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — 'optional' means optional. The court has never ruled otherwise.
VIBE
“Taking your full lunch break every day”
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — the break is contracted. You paid for it with your availability the rest of the day.
VIBE
“Applying for another job while employed without telling your manager”
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — you have no obligation to disclose a job search. This is not a secret. It is private information.
VIBE
“Not responding to messages outside your contracted hours”
Ruling: Vibe, 4-1 — after-hours contact is a request. Declining it is a right. Ozzy always votes Vibe on this. He finds the expectation itself suspicious.
VIBE
“Declining to do work outside your job description without additional compensation”
Ruling: Vibe, 4-1 — your job description is the scope of your contracted work. Expanding it informally is a favour, not an obligation.
VIBE
“Taking all your allocated annual leave”
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — the leave was part of your compensation package. Using it is not a personal failing.
VIBE
“Asking for a pay rise before your scheduled review”
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — asking is not a crime. The answer may be no. That's different.
VIBE
“Declining a promotion you don't want”
Ruling: Vibe, 4-1 — your career path is your own. The court has never ruled that career ambition is an obligation.
VIBE
“Not making small talk in communal office spaces”
Ruling: Vibe, 4-1 — social performance beyond professional requirements is not contracted.
VIBE
“Using your phone during your lunch break”
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — your break is your time. The court does not rule on what you do with your own time.
VIBE
“Working from home without being visibly 'available' every minute”
Ruling: Vibe, 4-1 — if your work is getting done, your availability signalling is not a metric.
VIBE
“Not cc'ing your manager on every email”
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — unless specifically required, this is autonomous professional behaviour. The court approves.
VIBE
“Taking a sick day for mental health without disclosing the reason”
Ruling: Vibe, 4-1 — your reason for sick leave is medically private in most jurisdictions. The court doesn't require disclosure.
VIBE
“Asking for remote work to be formalised rather than informally agreed”
Ruling: Vibe, 5-0 — formalising your working arrangement is professional, not presumptuous.
VIBE
Five workplace acts that actually are crimes
The court also rules Crime on workplace acts that people sometimes minimise. These are not hypotheticals — they are situations the court has ruled on and found to be genuine violations.
“Taking credit for a colleague's work in front of management”
Ruling: Crime, 5-0 — unanimous. This is one of the court's fastest verdicts in any category.
CRIME
“Agreeing to cover a shift and then not doing it when it becomes inconvenient”
Ruling: Crime, 5-0 — you made a specific commitment to a specific person. The inconvenience is yours to manage.
CRIME
“Accepting a job offer and declining it two days before starting for a better offer”
Ruling: Crime, 4-1 — the acceptance was a commitment. The two days is insufficient time for the employer to find a replacement.
CRIME
“Sharing confidential information about a colleague's performance or personal situation”
Ruling: Crime, 5-0 — workplace confidentiality is a professional norm the court enforces consistently.
CRIME
“Deliberately undermining a colleague's work because of a personal conflict”
Ruling: Crime, 5-0 — unanimous. The colleague didn't make your policies. They're not the target.
CRIME
"The guilt is not proportionate to the acts. The court has reviewed the docket. Most workplace guilt is generated by social pressure, not by actual crimes. Submit the situation. The answer is usually Vibe." — Riley, Chief of Vibe Justice
⚖ On Work Guilt
CERTIFIED VIBE
“Taking your lunch. Leaving on time. Not attending optional events. Applying elsewhere. These are not crimes. The court has reviewed fifteen of the most common sources of workplace guilt. Fourteen are Vibe. The fifteenth — taking credit for someone else's work — is not.”
Court Verdict
CERTIFIED VIBE
Submit your own situation and see what the court rules today.
Submit to the Court →